Efficient Positions

Frameworks for competitive strategy, the psychology of money, and business models of the future

Hello, fellow traveler. Every week (or so!), this dispatch helps you make better creative and strategic decisions. Sometimes that means essays. Sometimes that means resources. Last time it was a framework for making content decisions. This time it’s a framework on basic competitive strategy for agencies. It’s born of my experience helping to lead my former agency, but I think you’ll find it useful for any brand. Anyway, hello, it’s good to see you. -Steve

Gif by Arunas Kacinskas


So most agencies know how to get work done.

This is called operations.

But most agencies don’t know how to approach the market.

This is called positioning.

You need both to create a competitive strategy. 

Operations is how you do the things you do. Positioning is what things you offer, to whom, and why

The latter captures attention and converts it to work. 

The former captures that work and converts it to profit.

Doing operations well is called efficiency.

Agencies compete to be more efficient since, by their nature, services businesses are lower margin (your product is highly paid people).

The more efficiently an agency provides those services, the larger their margin. Do a nickel’s of work for a dime’s worth of pay. That’s how you keep the carnival going.

At the end of the day efficiency (+/- some other stuff!) is measured in profit: did you make more money than you spent?

Efficient operations is one half of competitive strategy

To increase your profit you can always do things like:

  • Pay your workers less

  • Charge your clients more

  • Reduce your operating expenses

  • All of the above

This is why agencies overwork staff, hire freelancers in remote cities with lower day rates, try to win awards to get famous, specialize in work few others can do, or go fully remote and stop buying snacks for the kitchen. 

If an agency based their strategy solely on the efficiency of its operations, their choices would look like this:

Specialize
Provide a differentiated and bespoke service. For example, part of my former agency’s business was creating executive keynote PowerPoints for live events. The service was bespoke. The creation process was torturous and slow. But there are few agencies who specialize in that service (and for that market, which we’ll get to down below). So it’s expensive.

Minimize
Provide a commodity service at a lower price. Do what everybody else does, maybe don’t do it as well, but definitely do it below market rate. A good option when the market is already established.

Generalize
Provide a commodity service for a majority of the market. This is what large agencies do. They compete on the efficiency of their scale combined with the quality of their work (or reputation).

Maximize
Provide a differentiated service. What a boutique agency might do. The winners are the ones with the highest-wattage talent and/or reputation for unique process work.

Each of these efficiency strategies can work! But, taken alone, they’re not a competitive strategy. They’re only one half of a competitive strategy. Any competitor could copy each operational approach. To have a defensible position, you must combine them with other, more unique and un-copyable activities. Here’s why.

You probably don’t have a unique process

Many agencies will say that their core differentiator is “our unique and proven process". For the great majority, this is not true. The great majority do roughly the same thing as their competitive set with roughly the same tools. They’re pretending their process is different and trying to sell the mystique.

And even if their process is unique, they’re still trying to do exactly what any good agency would tell a brand not to do: selling features rather than benefits.

Saying you have a unique process is like saying "Everybody else has a Flurgle but we have a Even Flurglier Flurgle!".

Ultimately if you only focus on Flurgle efficiency, two things will happen.

Everyone will copy you...

You’ll raise the bar for productivity, but the gains will be captured by your customers who can now choose among many efficient agencies who use your same process. If you think that’s not true, google Design Thinking. Or agile development.

...and you’ll end up looking like your competitors.

Outsourcing work? So is everybody else. Merging with other agencies? So is everybody else. Thinking about working remote? So is everybody else. 

This is not to say efficiency is bad

But the precision of your work must be combined with precision in targeting the correct customers. You have to “yes, and” your operations.

That is, you have to match how you do the work (efficiency) with what work you’re offering to whom (positioning). This allows you to capture the right kind of attention for the type of service you offer.

The simplest way to visualize this is, yes, a 2x2— but in a lazy attempt to distract you from the simplicity of my one trick, this 2x2 has a different look:

This is a (very) reductive framework, but it contains a powerful (basic) lesson. By choosing a quadrant in which to compete, you do two things:

  1. You limit your target market, so you can truly understand your customer

  2. You limit what services you offer, so you help your customer truly understand you

Here it is with some random, real-world agency examples: 

Consider Work & Co. They provide interactive experiences. They don’t do white papers, they don’t make tv commercials, they don’t do social strategy. They only offer interactive experiences—but, they do that for many different types of brands. You could call them a horizontal specialist. 

Consider Altitude. Altitude provides a variety of marketing and advertising services—but they only offer those services to B2B brands. You could call them a vertical specialist.

Accenture, meanwhile, will do almost any kind of work for almost any kind of brand. They’re not a specialist, unless their specialty is being able to spend more money than you.

Competitive strategy relies on the combination of efficiency and position

I want to be clear: This is not a new idea! This is a very old idea! But it’s an idea that seems to get lost among agencies: the key to competitive strategy is to combine a specific way of working (efficiency) with a specific target customer and service offering (positioning).

When you do that, you make it easier on yourself to make every strategic decision, from customers to target, to talent to hire, to services to sell. You create a unique value chain that provides competitive advantage. That makes it more difficult for competitors to copy you, which means by definition you have a defensible competitive position.

The alternative, of course, is to generalize your services and compete for every customer possible by using your non-unique process and inconsistent referral pipeline in a race to the bottom on price as you jostle with larger agencies.

Hope you have deep pockets.


Sources and Further Reading

Office hours

Want to chat? I host Office Hours every weekday to talk with anyone/everyone about strategic marketing decisions, content development, editorial ops, and more. What’s on your mind? Grab a 30-minute meeting. I’d love to meet you.


Last week’s most clicked links:

  1. IDEO’s Journal

  2. Expiring vs. Permanent Skills

  3. What Is Strategy? by Michael Porter (1996)

btw my twitter thread on last week’s content decisions essay kinda blew up (that was nice!), and our friend Edith wrote about the process of illustrating me in her excellent newsletter Drawing Links (she’s amazing, subscribe!)


Links to delight and entertain you


How can I help you?

This 100% organic, free-range, desktop-to-inbox newsletter is devoted to helping you make better creative decisions in marketing and beyond. Delivery at 6pm ET every Sunday, sharp as cheddar. Your host is Steve Bryant, who is for hire. If you’d like to chat just grab a 30-minute meeting. I’d love to meet you.


If you found this dispatch useful, please forward it to your friends and lovers. Thanks for hanging out. Be seeing you.